Your 5-year savings

How much do implant drills actually cost you?

Modeled on the industry midpoint of ~5 drill-passes per implant and a ~25-osteotomy service life for a stainless-steel edge, at $100 per replacement drill.

Steel replacement drill spend you’d avoid
$5,000 over 5 years

Net over 5 years after the $3,495 Crown Down kit: $1,505 saved

Steel replacement drills
$1,000/yr
Crown Down replacements
$0/yr

The Crown Down kit is a one-time $3,495 purchase and is guaranteed against wear-related loss of cutting performance for the life of the kit -- no scheduled replacement drills.

50
Implants placed per year15 - 500+
Book a 15-min callAuditable formulas · Break-even at ~25 implants/yr

Beyond the math: what the calculator can’t quantify

Cost is one axis. The rest of the argument for tungsten carbide drills is clinical and workflow-related, and it applies whether the direct-cost math tips in year 2 or year 8. Three benefits the calculator doesn’t attempt to price:

Workflow

The 2-step osteotomy workflow

One cortical drill, one trabecular drill. That replaces the 5- to 8-step steel sequence used by most implant systems. Fewer drill changes per site means 5 to 8 minutes saved on a typical osteotomy, fewer tray-side handovers, and a simpler surgical setup for guided and freehand cases alike.

See the 2-drill protocol

Guided surgery

No saline dependency

Steel implant drills at 800 to 2,000 RPM depend on copious saline irrigation to keep bone below the thermal-necrosis threshold. In guided surgery the guide sleeve restricts that flow to the cutting edge. Solid tungsten carbide manages heat by conducting it away from the osteotomy through the drill body, removing the saline-through-sleeve dependency.

Read the guided-surgery cooling problem

Bone biology

Low osteotomy heat

Tungsten carbide conducts heat at roughly 6× the rate of stainless steel and cuts efficiently at 200 RPM. In Crown Down bench thermal testing under the specified low-speed protocol, cutting-edge temperatures stayed within the range described by the classical Eriksson & Albrektsson (1983) heat-necrosis reference literature. Human clinical outcomes were not measured.

See the heat data

For a lower-volume practice these clinical differences may be worth more than a direct-cost delta that never quite tips within a 5-year window. For a high-volume practice they compound on top of the savings the calculator already shows.

When Crown Down doesn’t pay off

Cost comparisons should be honest in both directions. Crown Down is not the right economic answer for every practice. Two scenarios where a traditional kit stays cheaper across a 5-year window:

  • 1Very low case volume (under ~15 implants/year). At low volume the recurring replacement spend is small enough that a $1,200 steel kit stays cheaper than a $3,495 carbide kit for many years. If your practice places one or two implants a month, Crown Down doesn’t break even fast.
  • 2Practices that push steel drills well past retirement. If drills are used to 100+ osteotomies before replacement, recurring cost drops and traditional kits look more competitive on paper. The clinical trade-off is dull edges and higher osteotomy heat, but the direct-cost line shifts.

Cost alone will not always favor the carbide kit at every case volume. That’s the honest version, and it’s what the calculator reflects. Whether Crown Down is worth choosing anyway is where the clinical benefits above (workflow, no saline dependency, low heat) enter the decision.

Frequently asked questions

Quick answers to questions clinicians ask most about this topic.

Ready to upgrade your implant workflow?

The Crown Down kit replaces your entire drill sequence with 2 solid tungsten carbide drills, guided and freehand compatible, with universal implant-system support.

Free 15-min consultation • Guided and freehand compatible • All implant systems